Many financial institutions invest in a handful of foreign oil companies, such as PetroChina, that help fund the government of Sudan’s deadly campaign of violence against millions of its citizens. With over a billion-dollar stake, Vanguard is one of PetroChina’s largest investors.
In July 2009, despite Vanguard’s active opposition, shareholders of 21 Vanguard funds voted in support of the proposal with votes ranging from 7% to 17% in favor of genocide-free investing.
Results at the Vanguard shareholder meeting were lower than those in 2008 and 2009 at Fidelity, which ranged from 17% to 31%. Investors Against Genocide attributes the lower results to Vanguard’s statement of opposition which contended that the genocide-free investing proposal called for procedures that “duplicate” existing practices and were “substantially identical” to existing procedures of the Vanguard funds.
However, Vanguard’s “substantially identical” policy has not resulted in the sale of any of the large oil companies with ties to genocide. Rather, Vanguard’s Plain Talk About Proxy Proposal 3 web page states that “the trustees have determined that no companies have warranted divestment.”
Since the shareholder vote, Vanguard has continued to hold and purchase additional shares of PetroChina and Sinopec, oil companies tied to the genocide in Sudan.
Has a genocide-free investing policy
Divested from PetroChina
Voted for GFI shareholder proposal
Support this Campaign
Send a Message
Tell Vanguard, Fidelity, JPMorgan Chase, Franklin Resources and other financial firms to adopt a genocide-free investing policy. Sign the petition …
Spread the News
Vote Your Proxy
Please be sure to vote in favor of the genocide-free investing proposal whenever it appears on a proxy ballot on which you are voting. Read more …
July 3rd, 2009
July 2nd, 2009